Tourism as a gift? An “ethnography of exchanges” and the offer of an alleged community-based tourism experience in Anã / Santarém / Pará

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.7784/rbtur.v13i2.1568

Keywords:

Community-based tourism, Gift, Ethnography of the gift.

Abstract

This article intends to demonstrate that the experience of tourism carried out in the community of Anã/Santarém/Pará includes several relations of reciprocity, according to Mauss’ conception (1925/2017).  For this author, the Gift is ambivalent, as it is simultaneously interested and disinterested, willingly offered and at the same time obligatory. The ambivalent character of the Gift was understood by means of the notion of interest, as established by Bourdieu (2011). The field work followed the assumptions of the ethnographic research, and the methodological path was built from the conception of Lanna (2000) about the “ethnography of the gift”.  The data were collected through direct observation and interviews, in two periods: August of 2016 and January of 2017. We want to point out as main results: the observation of five reciprocity relations among the internal and external agents to the community of Anã, which involves many kind of “payments”, as Mauss defines it (1925/2017); the interpretation of tourism as a Gift in social environment in which the activity promotes the reciprocity of things and of its spiritual and symbolic meanings in an ambivalent way; the observation that the community does not hold autonomy to manage tourism in its territory. We consider that the experience of Anã did not amass, yet, the required elements to be regarded as a community-based tourism.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biographies

Giselle Castro Assis, Federal University of Pará (UFPA), Belém, Pará, Brazil.

PhD student in the Postgraduate Program in Sociology and Anthropology, Federal University of Pará (PPGSA/UFPA), Belém, PA, Brazil. Professor at the UFPA Faculty of Tourism, Belém, PA, Brazil.

Rodrigo Corrêa D. Peixoto, Federal University of Pará (UFPA), Belém, Pará, Brazil.

Teacher in the Postgraduate Program in Sociology and Anthropology, Federal University of Pará (PPGSA /UFPA), Belém, PA, Brazil. Professor at the UFPA, Faculty of Social Sciences, Belém, PA, Brazil.

References

Assis. G. C. (2017). A cultura ribeirinha como fator de atratividade para o turismo no Arapiuns/pa – Uma aná-lise sobre a colonialidade do saber amazônico. Seminário Internacional América Latina: Políticas e Conflitos Contemporâneos. II Sialat. Belém, PA: Núcleo de Altos Estudos Amazônicos.

Bourdier. P. (2011). É possível um ato desinteressado? Razões Práticas: sobre a teoria da ação. (M. Corrêa, trad.). (pp. 137-156). 11a ed. Campinas, SP: Papirus.

Campelo, L. (2015, out., 14). Turismo de base comunitária e artesanato da floresta ganham força com a fundação da primeira cooperativa do Rio Arapiuns. 2015. Disponível em: <http://rogerioalmeidafuro.blogspot.com.br/2015/05/turismo-de-base-comunitaria-e.html>.

Centro de Estudos Avançados em Promoção Social e Ambiental - Projeto Saúde e Alegria. (2011). Prazer em conhecer Anã. Santarém, PA: CEAPS.

Fanon, F. (2008). Peles negras, máscaras brancas. Salvador, BA: EDUFBA.

Geertz, C. (2015) A interpretação das culturas. [Reimpr.] Rio de Janeiro, RJ: LTC. (Trabalho original publicado em 1926).

Irving, M. A. (2009). Reinventando a reflexão sobre turismo de base comunitária – inovar é possível? In Tu-rismo de base comunitária: Diversidade de olhares e experiências brasileiras. (pp. 108-119). Rio de Janeiro, RJ: Letra e Imagem.

Kincaid, J. (2005). A small place. In Hernandez, J. B. (Ed.) Women writing resistance: essays on Latin América and the Caribbean. (pp. 147-156).. South End Press Cambridge, Massachusetts.

Lanna, M. (2000). Nota sobre Marcel Mauss e o ensaio sobre a dádiva. Revista de Sociologia e Política, (14), 173-194. https://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S0104-44782000000100010

Mauss, M. (2017). Ensaio sobre a dádiva: forma e razão da troca nas sociedades arcaicas. In Mauss, M. Sociologia e Antropologia. (P. Neves, trad.). (pp.191-308). São Paulo, SP: Ubu Editora. Originalmente publica-do em 1925.

Mielke, E.J.C. (2009). Desenvolvimento turístico de base comunitária. Campinas, SP: Editora Alínea.

Peirano, M. (2014). Etnografia não é método. Horizontes Antropológicos, 20(42), 377-391. https://dx.doi.org/10.1590/s0104-71832014000200015

Rodrigues Guimarães, A. C. (2013) ¿Será Bourdieu utilitarista?. Trabajo y Sociedad, 20, Verano, Santiago del Estero, Argentina.

Wellman, B., & Berkowitz, S.D. (1991). Introduction: Studying Social Structures. In: Wellman, B.; Berkowitz, S.D (Orgs.). Social Structures. A Network Aprroach. (pp. 1-14). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Published

2019-05-13

How to Cite

Assis, G. C., & Peixoto, R. C. D. (2019). Tourism as a gift? An “ethnography of exchanges” and the offer of an alleged community-based tourism experience in Anã / Santarém / Pará. Revista Brasileira De Pesquisa Em Turismo, 13(2), 144–160. https://doi.org/10.7784/rbtur.v13i2.1568